Support independent news: donate anonymously with BitcoinAdvertiseDonate
Tuesday, October 27, 2026Local news for Central Indiana, Indiana.
Central Indiana Herald · 350 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46204
News · Europe

Victorian Supreme Court rejects prisoner's legal challenge over Vegemite ban

Judge Claire Harris ruled that denying inmates the yeast spread is a proportionate measure for prison security and does not violate human rights charters.

By Elena Castillo ·

Illustration for: Victorian Supreme Court rejects prisoner's legal challenge over Vegemite ban
Illustration generated for this article, not a news photograph.

The Victorian Supreme Court dismissed Andre McKechnie's lawsuit on Monday, ruling that prison authorities do not violate human rights when they ban the yeast-based spread. McKechnie, a life prisoner, argued that the refusal to provide Vegemite denied him his right to enjoy his culture as an Australian. The court sided with the state corrections department, confirming that the ban remains in force for all inmates in Victorian facilities.

The legal dispute stems from a long-standing restriction on the condiment. Corrections Victoria banned Vegemite in 2006 due to security concerns. Officials cited the product's yeast properties, which allow it to ferment into alcohol, and its potential to interfere with narcotic detection dogs. These reasons were listed on the department's official contraband items list. McKechnie claimed this exclusion left him feeling sad and disconnected from his family and community.

McKechnie was sentenced to life in prison for the stabbing murder of property developer Otto Kuhne in Queensland. He served the first ten years of his sentence in that state before transferring to a Victorian prison. Upon his arrival in Victoria, he was told he could no longer consume the salty spread, prompting him to sue the corrections department. He sought a ruling that the refusal infringed upon his right to adequate food that maintains his health and wellbeing.

Justice Claire Harris analyzed the case under the state's human rights charter. She acknowledged that Vegemite may be regarded as part of Australian culture and that the charter could extend to certain foods. However, she determined that the ban was a proportionate measure justified by the statutory obligations of prison authorities. These obligations include the management, security, and good order of the prison, as well as the safe custody and welfare of prisoners.

The ruling states that the specific refusal to permit McKechnie access to Vegemite is reasonable and demonstrably justified. The court found no statutory right under the Corrections Act to consume the product while in custody. This decision aligns with bans currently in place in Queensland, South Australia, and Tasmania, though New South Wales still allows the spread in its correctional centres.

Vegemite was developed in Melbourne in 1923 as an alternative to the United Kingdom's Marmite. It has since become a staple of many Australian breakfasts, despite its polarising taste. The brand was acquired by Bega from US-based Kraft in 2013. With the Supreme Court's decision, the legal path for other inmates to challenge the ban in Victoria is now closed.

Source: The Guardian

More News · Report a business · Got a Story?

Get Central Indiana Herald in your inboxLocal news for Central Indiana, Indiana. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.

Get Central Indiana Herald in your inboxLocal news for Central Indiana, Indiana. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.